Under-reporting by surgical pathologists in tissue removed during revision surgery for metal-on-metal arthroplasties.

Abstract

Although adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) have been reported for metal-on-metal implants (MoM) requiring early revision surgery, no study has looked at the accuracy of surgical pathologists in diagnosing ALTR. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of reporting adverse local tissue reactions in tissue samples following revision surgery from metal-on-metal implants. The authors reviewed histology glass slides as well as the original pathology reports of tissue processed in revision arthroplasties in 23 cases. These samples were microscopically analyzed for tissue necrosis and cystic degeneration, the presence of metal particles, corrosion byproducts, membrane formation, histiocytic cells, lymphocytic cells, and vascular pathology. The authors' findings were then compared to their corresponding original pathology reports. The authors found consistent under-reporting of the tissue findings. Most importantly, 18 samples showed evidence of metal present compared to 2 samples on original pathology reporting. The authors found that 15 samples showed evidence of pathological membranous tissue compared to just 6 on original pathology reporting. While just 3 of the original pathology reports indicated the presence of areas of predominantly lymphocytic inflammatory cells, the authors found 13 examples of such areas. Although ALTR reactions have been described as a sequala of failed MoM, the authors' data suggest that ALTR may occur more frequently than previously described. Under-reported findings of ALTR deprive both the patient and orthopaedic surgeon of important information that can help guide further follow-up.