Abstract

Although electric drives can locally reduce the environmental impact of traffic, the penetration rates of battery electric vehicles (BEV) are far below expectations, not least because the charging infrastructure network is still considered insufficient by potential users. Therefore, the planning of charging infrastructure that considers both needs and user requirements is essential to remove an important barrier to widespread adaptation of e-vehicles, but it is also a challenge. A better understanding of the charging behavior and the underlying usage motivation is therefore needed. A frequently mentioned factor is the so-called range stress. While there are many studies on this subject with new BEV users, there is a lack of approaches that also include experienced e-vehicle users and at the same time allow a comparison with drivers of cars with internal combustion engines (ICE). In this paper, this is realized with the help of a questionnaire study ( n = 204 ). The results show that ICE and BEV users at different experience levels hardly differ regarding the perceived range stress; BEV users even perceive less stress. BEV users also showed more trust in the vehicle and in the tank/battery indicators, while this trust depends only marginally on the type of information provided by the car. Furthermore, there is a correlation between users’ technology commitment and risk-taking, on the one hand, and range stress, on the other. However, for the prediction of range stress, gender, experience with e-cars, and the question of whether cars are privately owned, or car-sharing is used, are more relevant.

Highlights

  • Resource scarcity, climate change, and health risks from air pollution are among the greatest global challenges facing our society today [1]

  • The focus is on the relationships between these factors, as well as on the influence of risk taking and technology commitment on range stress

  • The results reported by [27,28] were confirmed for a sample of novice and experienced drivers of both battery electric vehicles (BEV) and internal combustion engines (ICE) vehicles, the level of correlation was lower in the current study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate change, and health risks from air pollution are among the greatest global challenges facing our society today [1]. Transportation is relevant, as conventional combustion engines run on fossil fuels and produce large amounts of CO2 [2] and NOx [3]. In Germany, for example, several major cities are currently struggling to comply with the thresholds of the European. Union for nitrogen dioxide in the air. Against this background, electric mobility represents a key solution for local emission reduction by means of alternative drive technologies. Individual transport offers great potential for improvement, since passenger cars account for the largest share of the vehicle population and the proportion of electric vehicles is still low.

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call