Abstract

Purpose Since the implementation of widespread serum total prostate specific antigen based screening, the risk of prostate cancer over-diagnosis has become a concern. We evaluated the amount of possible over and under-diagnosis of prostate cancer in an asymptomatic screening population with a total prostate specific antigen of 2.0 to 3.9 (lower range) and 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml (higher range). Materials and Methods A total of 680 patients with prostate cancer were included. Possible over-diagnosis was defined as Gleason score less than 7, pathological stage pT2a and negative surgical margins. Under-diagnosis was defined as pathological stage pT3 or greater, or positive surgical margins. Furthermore, insignificant tumors according to the Epstein criteria were evaluated in a small subset of patients for whom cancer volume information was available. Results In the lower and higher total prostate specific antigen ranges there was an over-diagnosis rate of 19.7% and 16.5%, and an under-diagnosis rate of 18.9% and 36.7%, respectively ( P Conclusions These data show that the reported estimates of over-diagnosis in the low total prostate specific antigen group are exaggerated in a screening population. Using our criteria, prostate cancer under-diagnosis occurs more frequently than over-diagnosis in the total prostate specific antigen range of 4.0 to 10 ng/ml.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call