Abstract
The location of this research is the university, through which we are progressively channeled into a seemingly insoluble Gordian knot. What is our participation in the university and what cultural and human commitments inform this participation? More trivially, what rights and duties does the individual acquire or lose within his or her academic identities? Our main target was finding an ideal organizational practice to examine, such as an emergency event. What strategy can the university adopt? Can it realign its distortions and retain its resources? How and in what ways? What information is needed for this purpose? Which actors are relevant in this process? A systemic survey model is, therefore, presented to analyze data obtained from a sample of 200 respondents from various academic groups, including students, professors, administrative staff, and other stakeholders. Quotas were used for the primary challenge posed by the pictures representing dimensions according to a systemic schema of organizational effectiveness (OE). Respondents were then asked to judge the dimensions and pictures against their personal capacity for intellectual identity, functionalism, and materialism. During the test, the participants were expected to develop their capacity to approach phenomenal consciousness and the search for its neural correlates, thereby becoming familiar with the high-order demands and challenges posed by the current information available to them. A nine-item interval behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS) was used to develop a systemic matrix that could show the participants’ collective OE when an emergency event occurs at the university. This study aims to stimulate a broader investigation into the preparation of programs and plans that should be a priority today in the context of sustainability in educational institutions, thereby setting useful thresholds on decision-making paths. To develop the collective model, a matrix generated by each respondents’ dimensional modal values (DMVs) in the test and the overall samples’ modal values (OMMVs) were used. Borrowing from Luce’s theory of probability, we analyzed the similarity of the OE university matrix from the results in descending order, restricting our attention to modal values which were chosen for the test and demonstrate how the learning model was formulated to assume that each group with evolved behavior could respond adaptively to a conditional function thanks to its permanence in a university environment.
Highlights
A “natural disaster” does not amount to a “violation of human rights”, the latter being increasingly condemned by the intersection of the universalist and trans-contextual
Borrowing from Luce’s theory of probability, we analyzed the similarity of the organizational effectiveness (OE) university matrix from the results in descending order, restricting our attention to modal values which were chosen for the test and demonstrate how the learning model was formulated to assume that each group with evolved behavior could respond adaptively to a conditional function thanks to its permanence in a university environment
It seemed appropriate to analyze the steps for the generation of a decision tree which can sketch the structure of organizational effectiveness (OE) through which the four university groups of respondents can operate with an integrated approach during an emergency
Summary
A “natural disaster” does not amount to a “violation of human rights”, the latter being increasingly condemned by the intersection of the universalist and trans-contextual. It seemed appropriate to analyze the steps for the generation of a decision tree which can sketch the structure of organizational effectiveness (OE) through which the four university groups of respondents can operate with an integrated approach during an emergency. At first glance, this decision tree is considered “bushy” because it entails a high degree of complexity [2]. We believe that in the case of an important subject, such as that of an emergency event, the general attitudes aroused by personal relationships within academic groups are capable of expressing appropriate psychological aspects, such as opinions and information sharing. We integrated suggestions based on a qualitative understanding on this collective issue through the creation of four practical choice samples to model the effectiveness of the four response sets at the university
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
