Abstract

The concept of customer satisfaction occupies a central role in the marketing discipline. Not surprisingly, researchers have produced an impressive body of literature that focuses on the causes and consequences of satisfaction. In marketing, the antecedents of satisfaction have been investigated primarily through the disconfirmation paradigm which holds that satisfaction is the result of conscious mental accounting comparisons undertaken by customers. Furthermore, empirical findings of disconfirmation-satisfaction link, which are broadly congruent, suggest that when performance either conforms to or exceeds initial expectations, a mental state of positive disconfirmation ensues, leading to satisfaction. Despite this insight, a major gap in our understanding of satisfaction concerns lack of generalizability of the disconfirmation model. Specifically, most studies have been conducted in the physical goods setting, thereby raising concerns about the applicability of this model to service exchanges which are more commonplace today. Services differ from goods with respect to intrinsic properties and the manner of delivery. As such, it is possible that the process underlying customers’ satisfaction judgments will differ between goods and services. To investigate generalizability of the disconfirmation paradigm, this paper reports the results of a meta-analysis that incorporates the effect of four moderating variables, i.e., (a) good or service, (b) measure of expectation, (c) definition of satisfaction, and (d) satisfaction scale, on the focal relationship between disconfirmation and satisfaction. Our findings suggest that the effect of disconfirmation on satisfaction is weaker for services than it is for physical goods. In addition, by including other moderator variables we find that that there is sufficient residual variance (in excess of 50%) to warrant further investigation of the expectation-disconfirmation paradigm. Implications of this research for theory development and the scope for further research are discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call