Abstract
Anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) confer a cancer immunotherapeutic effect (CITE) but cause severe immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAE). Targeting CTLA-4 has shown remarkable long-term benefit and thus remains a valuable tool for cancer immunotherapy if the irAE can be brought under control. An animal model, which recapitulates clinical irAE and CITE, would be valuable for developing safer CTLA-4-targeting reagents. Here, we report such a model using mice harboring the humanized Ctla4 gene. In this model, the clinically used drug, Ipilimumab, induced severe irAE especially when combined with an anti-PD-1 antibody; whereas another mAb, L3D10, induced comparable CITE with very mild irAE under the same conditions. The irAE corresponded to systemic T cell activation and resulted in reduced ratios of regulatory to effector T cells (Treg/Teff) among autoreactive T cells. Using mice that were either homozygous or heterozygous for the human allele, we found that the irAE required bi-allelic engagement, while CITE only required monoallelic engagement. As with the immunological distinction for monoallelic vs bi-allelic engagement, we found that bi-allelic engagement of the Ctla4 gene was necessary for preventing conversion of autoreactive T cells into Treg cells. Humanization of L3D10, which led to loss of blocking activity, further increased safety without affecting the therapeutic effect. Taken together, our data demonstrate that complete CTLA-4 occupation, systemic T cell activation and preferential expansion of self-reactive T cells are dispensable for tumor rejection but correlate with irAE, while blocking B7-CTLA-4 interaction impacts neither safety nor efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. These data provide important insights for the clinical development of safer and potentially more effective CTLA-4-targeting immunotherapy.
Highlights
Anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies have shown a cancer immunotherapeutic effect (CITE) in mouse models[1,2,3] and melanoma patients.[4,5] In combination, the anti-PD-1 mAb, Nivolumab, and the anti-CTLA-4 mAb, Ipilimumab, significantly increased objective response rates in advanced melanoma patients.[6,7] Promising results emerged from this combination therapy in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).[8]
Since the anti-CTLA-4 mAb-induced corpuscular volume (MCV) among the majority of the mice adverse events are relatively mild in mice, this model failed to treated with Ipilimumab + anti-PD-1, while those that received recapitulate clinical observations
Since anti-human CTLA-4 mAbs used in this study do not react with mouse CTLA-4 molecules (Supplementary information, Figure S7), we evaluated whether immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAE) and CITE require similar levels of receptor engagement by comparing irAE and CITE in Ctla4h/m mice
Summary
Anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown a cancer immunotherapeutic effect (CITE) in mouse models[1,2,3] and melanoma patients.[4,5] In combination, the anti-PD-1 mAb, Nivolumab, and the anti-CTLA-4 mAb, Ipilimumab, significantly increased objective response rates in advanced melanoma patients.[6,7] Promising results emerged from this combination therapy in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).[8]. Since the anti-CTLA-4 mAb-induced corpuscular volume (MCV) among the majority of the mice adverse events are relatively mild in mice, this model failed to treated with Ipilimumab + anti-PD-1, while those that received recapitulate clinical observations As such it is of limited value in L3D10 + anti-PD-1 were unaffected (Fig. 1d). Taking these factors into consideration, we report frequency of mature red blood cells (stage V) explaining their a model system that faithfully recapitulates the irAEs observed in severe anemia. To understand the distinct autoimmune adverse effect, we analyzed the impact of anti-PD-1 + Ipilimumab on the Treg/Teff ratio in mice homozygous and heterozygous for human CTLA-4.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.