Unconscious bias in speaker introductions at a national vascular surgery meeting: The impact of rank, race and gender

Abstract

ObjectivesUnconscious bias can impact manner of speaker introductions in formal academic settings. We examined speaker introductions at the Society of Vascular Surgeons Annual Meeting to determine factors associated with non-professional address. MethodsWe examined speaker introductions from the 2019 SVS Vascular Annual Meeting. Professional title with either full name or last name was considered professional address. Speaker and moderator demographics were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify associations between introduction and speaker and moderator characteristics. Results336 talks met inclusion criteria. Both speakers and moderators were more likely to be white (63.4 ​% and 65.8 ​%,p ​= ​0.92), man (75.6 ​% and 74.4 ​%,p ​= ​0.82) and full professor rank (34.5 ​% and 42.3 ​%, p ​< ​0.001). On multivariable regression, non-professional address was associated with speaker rank of trainee (OR 3.13, p ​= ​0.05) and when moderator was white (OR 2.42, p ​= ​0.03). ConclusionsThis study emphasizes the potential negative impact of unconscious bias at a national meeting for vascular surgeons and the need to mitigate this effect at the organization level.