Abstract

Implant-associated infections remain one of the main problems in the treatment of open tibia fractures. The role of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis is now agreed and accepted; nevertheless, recent literature also seems to emphasize the importance of local antibiotic therapy at the fracture site. Several therapeutic strategies have been proposed to overcome this new need. Antibiotic-coated nails play crucial role in this, allowing both infection prevention and favoring the fracture stabilization. We describe the outcome of patients with open diaphyseal tibia fracture treated either with a standard uncoated nail or a gentamicin-coated nail from January 2016 to December 2018 at our second level emergency-urgency department. Primary outcomes were infection rate and bone union rate. Other outcomes reported are reoperation rate, time between injury and nailing, and safety of antibiotic nail. Numerical variables were tabulated using mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and number of observations. Categorical variables were tabulated using number of observations. 23 patients treated with uncoated nail and 23 patients treated with antibiotic-coated tibia nail were included in the study and were evaluated for a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Among the 46 patients, 9 were Gustilo-Anderson type I, 21 type II, and 16 type III open fracture. Regarding the bone healing rate at 12 months, 16 fractures in the first group and 18 in the second were completely healed. 4 infections were found in the first group (3 superficial surgical site infection and 1 osteomyelitis) and 3 superficial infections in the second one. No adverse events have been recorded with antibiotic-coated nails. In this unicentric retrospective study observed no deep wound infections and good fracture healing in the use of antibiotic-coated nails. Antibiotic nails have been shown to play a role in the treatment of fractures in critically ill patients with severe soft tissue damage.

Highlights

  • Implant-associated infections remain one of the major problems in orthopedic and trauma surgery

  • There was instead a significant difference in between the two groups about the severity of the fracture and the grade of the exposure

  • The latest systematic review and meta-analysis by Craig et al [7] has shown the benefit of local prophylactic antibiotic therapy, in addition to systemic antibiotics, due to reduce the infection rate in open tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Implant-associated infections remain one of the major problems in orthopedic and trauma surgery. They often require multiple aggressive treatments such as implant removal, surgical debridement, and long-term antibiotic therapy with long in-hospital stay resulting in higher social and healthcare costs [1]. Considering the hard consequences involving the patient’s quality of life, it is strongly required to improve the prevention and treatment of the infections, mostly in traumatology. Elective orthopedic surgery usually has a low infection rate (0.7-4.2%) [2] that increases in patients with acute fractures, especially in those with open fractures. Among all long bone fractures, open tibia fractures showed the highest rate of infection (8.8%) compared to closed fracture (2%), due to BioMed Research International more extensive comminution, segmental bone loss, poorer soft tissue coverage, and vascularization [3, 4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call