Abstract

Pre-production quality defect inspection is a crucial step in industrial manufacturing, and many traditional inspection strategies suffer from inefficiency issues. This is especially true for tasks such as mechanical performance testing of steel products, which involve time-consuming processes like offline sampling, specimen preparation, and testing. The inspection volume significantly impacts the production cycle, inventory, yield, and labor costs. Constructing a data-driven model for predicting product quality and implementing proactive sampling inspection based on the prediction results is an appealing solution. However, the prediction uncertainty of data-driven models poses a challenging problem that needs to be addressed. This paper proposes an active quality inspection approach for steel products based on the uncertainty quantification in the predictive model for mechanical performance. The objective is to reduce both the sampling frequency and the omission rate on the production site. First, an ensemble model based on improved lower and upper bound estimation is established for interval prediction of mechanical performance. The uncertainty of the specific value prediction model is quantitatively estimated using interval probability distributions. Then, a predictive model for the mechanical performance failure probability is built based on the prediction interval size and probability distribution. By determining an appropriate probability threshold, the trade-off between prediction accuracy and defect detection accuracy (recall rate) is balanced, enabling the establishment of an active sampling strategy. Finally, this functionality is integrated into the manufacturing execution system of a steel factory, realizing a mechanical performance inspection approach based on proactive sampling. The proposed approach is validated using real production datasets. When the probability threshold is set to 30%, the prediction accuracy and recall rate for failure mechanical performance samples are 75% and 100%, respectively. Meanwhile, the sampling rate is only 5.33%, while controlling the risk of omission. This represents a 50% reduction in sampling rate compared to the inspection rules commonly used in actual production. The overall efficiency of product quality inspection is improved, and inspection costs are reduced.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call