Abstract

Particle image velocimetry (PIV) has become the chief experimental technique for velocity field measurements in fluid flows. The technique yields quantitative visualizations of the instantaneous flow patterns, which are typically used to support the development of phenomenological models for complex flows or for validation of numerical simulations. However, due to the complex relationship between measurement errors and experimental parameters, the quantification of the PIV uncertainty is far from being a trivial task and has often relied upon subjective considerations. Recognizing the importance of methodologies for the objective and reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) of experimental data, several PIV-UQ approaches have been proposed in recent years that aim at the determination of objective uncertainty bounds in PIV measurements.This topical review on PIV uncertainty quantification aims to provide the reader with an overview of error sources in PIV measurements and to inform them of the most up-to-date approaches for PIV uncertainty quantification and propagation. The paper first introduces the general definitions and classifications of measurement errors and uncertainties, following the guidelines of the International Organization for Standards (ISO) and of renowned books on the topic. Details on the main PIV error sources are given, considering the entire measurement chain from timing and synchronization of the data acquisition system, to illumination, mechanical properties of the tracer particles, imaging of those, analysis of the particle motion, data validation and reduction. The focus is on planar PIV experiments for the measurement of two- or three-component velocity fields.Approaches for the quantification of the uncertainty of PIV data are discussed. Those are divided into a-priori UQ approaches, which provide a general figure for the uncertainty of PIV measurements, and a-posteriori UQ approaches, which are data-based and aim at quantifying the uncertainty of specific sets of data. The findings of a-priori PIV-UQ based on theoretical modelling of the measurement chain as well as on numerical or experimental assessments are discussed. The most up-to-date approaches for a-posteriori PIV-UQ are introduced, highlighting their capabilities and limitations.As many PIV experiments aim at determining flow properties derived from the velocity fields (e.g. vorticity, time-average velocity, Reynolds stresses, pressure), the topic of PIV uncertainty propagation is tackled considering the recent investigations based on Taylor series and Monte Carlo methods. Finally, the uncertainty quantification of 3D velocity measurements by volumetric approaches (tomographic PIV and Lagrangian particle tracking) is discussed.

Highlights

  • The technique yields quantitative visualizations of the instantaneous flow patterns, which are typically used to support the development of phenomenological models for complex flows or for validation of numerical simulations

  • Recognizing the importance of methodologies for the objective and reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) of experimental data, several Particle image velocimetry (PIV)-UQ approaches have been proposed in recent years that aim at the determination of objective uncertainty bounds in PIV measurements

  • The attention has shifted towards the data-based a-posteriori uncertainty quantification, which proposes to quanti­fy the local and instantaneous uncertainties of the measured velocity fields

Read more

Summary

Relevance of uncertainty quantification in particle image velocimetry (PIV)

PIV has undergone great advances over the past 30 years, becoming the leading flow measurement technique for research and development in fluid mechanics The use of such ‘universal constant’ to characterize the uncertainty of PIV measurements is overly simplistic, as the actual uncertainty is known to vary greatly from experiment to experiment, and to vary in space and time even within a single experiment, depending on the specific flow and imaging conditions, and on the image evaluation algorithm For this reason, in the recent years the PIV community has payed increasing attention to the quantification of the PIV uncertainty, as demonstrated by a dedicated workshop held in Las Vegas in 2011, the constant presence of dedicated sessions at the recent Lisbon International Symposia and the International Symposia on Particle Image Velocimetry, and Figure 1. This work presents a survey of the most relevant approaches for PIV uncertainty quantification, aiming to guide the experimenters in the selection of the right tools and methodologies to evaluate and document the uncertainties of their results

Experimental errors and uncertainty: definitions and classification
Measurement errors and their classification
Error sources in PIV measurements Topical Review
Errors due to installation and alignment
Timing and synchronization errors
Particles tracing capability
Illumination
Errors due to the flow
Errors due to the evaluation technique
PIV uncertainty quantification approaches
A-priori uncertainty quantification approaches
A-priori uncertainty quantification by theoretical modelling of the measurement chain
A-priori uncertainty quantification by numerical or exper­ imental assessment
A-posteriori uncertainty quantification approaches
Moment of correlation plane
Assessment methods
Performance assessment studies
Survey of applications
PIV uncertainty propagation
Uncertainty of derived statistical properties
Uncertainty of derived instantaneous properties
Stereo-PIV uncertainty quantification
Volumetric PIV/LPT uncertainty quantification
Uncertainty of pressure and pressure gradient
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call