Abstract

Machine learning interatomic potentials (IPs) can provide accuracy close to that of first-principles methods, such as density functional theory (DFT), at a fraction of the computational cost. This greatly extends the scope of accurate molecular simulations, providing opportunities for quantitative design of materials and devices on scales hitherto unreachable by DFT methods. However, machine learning IPs have a basic limitation in that they lack a physical model for the phenomena being predicted and therefore have unknown accuracy when extrapolating outside their training set. In this paper, we propose a class of Dropout Uncertainty Neural Network (DUNN) potentials that provide rigorous uncertainty estimates that can be understood from both Bayesian and frequentist statistics perspectives. As an example, we develop a DUNN potential for carbon and show how it can be used to predict uncertainty for static and dynamical properties, including stress and phonon dispersion in graphene. We demonstrate two approaches to propagate uncertainty in the potential energy and atomic forces to predicted properties. In addition, we show that DUNN uncertainty estimates can be used to detect configurations outside the training set, and in some cases, can serve as a predictor for the accuracy of a calculation.

Highlights

  • Molecular simulation methods are powerful computational tools for exploring material behavior on nano- and microscopic scales, which can be difficult to investigate experimentally[1,2]

  • Other properties that follow can be computed as functions of the the training of the Dropout Uncertainty Neural Network (DUNN) potential.) We show how the uncertainty estimation built into the DUNN model can be applied to physical total energy and its derivatives

  • We demonstrate the utility of the uncertainty estimation procedure described above for a DUNN potential for carbon corresponding to a Young’s modulus of 1084 GPa, which is in excellent agreement with density functional theory (DFT) calculations (1084 GPa37) and npj Computational Materials (2020) 124

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Molecular simulation methods are powerful computational tools for exploring material behavior on nano- and microscopic scales, which can be difficult to investigate experimentally[1,2]. The histogram of the uncertainty obtained using the committee model (Supplementary Fig. 3) is qualitatively similar to Fig. 5 Both approaches are able to determine transferability limits since the histogram of the uncertainty for the training set (monolayer, bilayer, and graphite) does not overlap with the histogram for configurations associated with the QOI (diamond). The distributions obtained from the committee model are far broader, and perhaps due to the limited sample size, the committee model predicts an uncertainty for diamond configurations that is about an order of magnitude larger than the DUNN potential when the training set does not contain diamond configurations (cf Fig. 5a with Supplementary Fig. 3a). We compute the average NLL for the DUNN model, the committee model, and a fully connected NN model for

METHODS
DISCUSSION
N2τ V2
CODE AVAILABILITY
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call