Abstract

Globalization forces analysts to demand extended control of variability in analytical measurements. A calculation procedure named the "error budget model" following recommendations proposed more than 20 years ago by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures is established as a rule for evaluating and expressing the measurement uncertainty across a broad spectrum of measurements. This metrological approach common in physical measurement is not applicable in separation techniques and cannot quantitate measurement uncertainty. Our experiments show that it can be used as a planning tool in the validation of thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) methods. A computer program that quantitates uncertainty components associated with potential sources of uncertainty in quantitative TLC is prepared and tested with experimental data. TLC plates with different qualities of stationary phases (TLC and high-performance TLC) spotted with different types of samples are measured. Application is performed manually and automatically. Plates are scanned with UV-vis scanners and a video documentation system in remission and transmission mode and fluorescence. Although the calculated values are close to the values obtained with validation procedures, the error budget approach cannot substitute validation. Calculated results can predict critical points in real quantitative TLC, but they cannot confirm the validity of a selected chromatographic procedure.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call