Abstract
Scientific challenges exist on how to extract information from the wide range of projected impacts simulated by crop models driven by climate ensembles. A stronger focus is required to understand and identify the mechanisms and drivers of projected changes in crop yield. In this study, we investigate the robustness of future projections of five metrics relevant to agriculture stakeholders (accumulated frost days, dry days, growing season length, plant heat stress and start of field operations). We use a large ensemble of climate simulations by the MIT IGSM-CAM integrated assessment model that accounts for the uncertainty associated with different emissions scenarios, climate sensitivities, and representations of natural variability. By the end of the century, the US is projected to experience fewer frosts, a longer growing season, more heat stress and an earlier start of field operations—although the magnitude and even the sign of these changes vary greatly by regions. Projected changes in dry days are shown not to be robust. We highlight the important role of natural variability, in particular for changes in dry days (a precipitation-related index) and heat stress (a threshold index). The wide range of our projections compares well the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble, especially for temperature-related indices. This suggests that using a single climate model that accounts for key sources of uncertainty can provide an efficient and complementary framework to the more common approach of multi-model ensembles. We also show that greenhouse gas mitigation has the potential to significantly reduce adverse effects (heat stress, risks of pest and disease) of climate change on agriculture, while also curtailing potentially beneficial impacts (earlier planting, possibility for multiple cropping). A major benefit of climate mitigation is potentially preventing changes in several indices to emerge from the noise of natural variability, even by 2100. This has major implications considering that any significant climate change impacts on crop yield would result in nation-wide changes in the agriculture sector. Finally, we argue that the analysis of agro-climate indices should more often complement crop model projections, as they can provide valuable information to better understand the drivers of changes in crop yield and production and thus better inform adaptation decisions.
Highlights
Climate change is expected to have a substantial impact on agricultural production because agriculture is highly dependent on climate variables such as precipitation, temperature, and radiation
We evaluate the capability of the IGSM-CAM to simulate the five agro-climate indices for present-day conditions using two independent observational datasets: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) reanalysis (Rienecker et al, 2011), at 0.5 x 0.66 resolution, and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) Reanalysis (Kalnay et al, 1996), at T62 gaussian grid
While these projections are subject to substantial uncertainty, we show that using a single climate model that accounts for key sources of uncertainty provides an efficient and complementary framework to the more common approach of multi-model ensemble (i.e. CMIP5 ensemble)
Summary
Climate change is expected to have a substantial impact on agricultural production because agriculture is highly dependent on climate variables such as precipitation, temperature, and radiation. The vulnerability of agriculture and food security to climate change has been extensively investigated, generally relying on biophysical models (Asseng et al, 2013; Rosenzweig et al, 2014; Beach et al, 2015; Wiebe et al, 2015) or empirical models (Lobell et al, 2006; Schlenker and Roberts, 2009; Blanc, 2012; Sue Wing et al, 2015) Such studies, even though they use very different sets of crop models, indicate strong negative impacts of climate change without adaptive measures, but with a large uncertainty in the range of impacts. A stronger focus is required to understand and identify the mechanisms and drivers of projected changes in crop yield
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
