Abstract
Although paleoflood reconstructions are frequently used to provide discharge estimates of extreme floods, a concern remains regarding uncertainty in Manning's n-values. An analysis of this uncertainty relative to a commonly used step-backwater model was performed for channel reaches in five canyon rivers. Values of n were selected for each study reach using four methods. Each set of n-values was then varied by ±10% and ±25%. The percentage change in discharge associated with varying n-values is inversely proportional to channel gradient and to width/depth ratio, and proportional to roughness. For channels with a gradient less than or equal to approximately 0.01, varying n by ±25% produces a maximum change of 20% in discharge. The greatest discrepancy among n-values estimated using the four methods occurred for channels with relatively low gradient and low roughness, but associated discharge varied fairly consistently between 13 and 27%. These results indicate that uncertainties in discharge estimation resulting from the roughness coefficient in step-backwater modeling of paleofloods are comparable to or lower than uncertainties associated with other methods of indirectly estimating flood discharges.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.