Abstract
Remaining carbon budget specifies the cap on global cumulative CO2 emissions from the present-day onwards that would be in line with limiting global warming to a specific maximum level. In the context of the Paris Agreement, global warming is usually interpreted as the externally-forced response to anthropogenic activities and emissions, but it excludes the natural fluctuations of the climate system known as internal variability. A remaining carbon budget can be calculated from an estimate of the anthropogenic warming to date, and either (i) the ratio of CO2-induced warming to cumulative emissions, known as the Transient Climate Response to Emissions (TCRE), in addition to information on the temperature response to the future evolution of non-CO2 emissions; or (ii) climate model scenario simulations that reach a given temperature threshold. Here we quantify the impact of internal variability on the carbon budgets consistent with the Paris Agreement derived using either approach, and on the TCRE diagnosed from individual models. Our results show that internal variability contributes approximately ±0.09 °C to the overall uncertainty range of the human-induced warming to-date, leading to a spread in the remaining carbon budgets as large as ±50 PgC, when using approach (i). Differences in diagnosed TCRE due to internal variability in individual models can be as large as ±0.1 °C/1000 PgC (5%–95% range). Alternatively, spread in the remaining carbon budgets calculated from (ii) using future concentration-driven simulations of large ensembles of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models is estimated at ±30 PgC and ±40 PgC (5%–95% range). These results are important for model evaluation and imply that caution is needed when interpreting small remaining budgets in policy discussions. We do not question the validity of a carbon budget approach in determining mitigation requirements. However, due to intrinsic uncertainty arising from internal variability, it may only be possible to determine the exact year when a budget is exceeded in hindsight, highlighting the importance of a precautionary approach.
Highlights
Global warming is approximately proportional to the total amount of CO2 emitted [1, 2]
We examine the contribution of internal variability in the anthropogenic warming estimate, and quantify the impact of internal variability on the remaining carbon budgets calculated using either approach (i) or (ii), as well as the role of internal climate variability on the TCRE diagnosed from individual models
Effects of internal variability on TCRE Internal variability in the climate system can be quantified as uncertainty across the individual ensemble members in a large ensemble of simulations from each model, because each ensemble member is subject to identical forced radiative forcing
Summary
Global warming is approximately proportional to the total amount of CO2 emitted [1, 2] This ratio of CO2-induced warming to cumulative CO2 emissions during the period when emissions and atmospheric CO2 are increasing, is defined as the Transient Climate Response to cumulative CO2 Emissions (TCRE), and provides the basis for the concept of carbon budgets. A carbon budget is the total amount of CO2 that can be emitted while limiting global temperature change to below a particular threshold with a given probability The remaining carbon budget in a similar way refers to the amount of CO2 from the present day onwards that can still be emitted while limiting warming to below a particular threshold. We examine the contribution of internal variability in the anthropogenic warming estimate, and quantify the impact of internal variability on the remaining carbon budgets calculated using either approach (i) or (ii), as well as the role of internal climate variability on the TCRE diagnosed from individual models
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
