Abstract
One-dimensional (1D) cable model is used to study electrical excitation of nerves and muscle fibers, and to aid in the design of electrical therapies. However, approximations inherent in the cable model limit its validity. More realistic three-dimensional (3D) fiber models have been advocated but they require long computational times. This study investigates whether better accuracy of 3D models is worth the cost by computing the probability p that the difference between outputs from 3D and 1D models could have arisen from uncertainties in parameter values. The results are summarized in contour maps of probability p in the space of fiber-electrode distances and stimulus durations. The cable model is considered valid where \(p>0.05\). This region of validity depends on uncertainties in the parameters. In particular, the uncertainties must exceed 0.05 (0.02) of the nominal parameter values for the cable model to be valid in the regions where retinal (cochlear) implants operate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
