Abstract

The validation of structural health monitoring (SHM) systems for aircraft is complicated by the extent and number of factors that the SHM system must demonstrate for robust performance. Therefore, a time- and cost-efficient method for examining all of the sensitive factors must be conducted. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of using the simulation modeling environment to determine the SHM sensitive factors that must be considered for subsequent experiments, in order to enable the SHM validation. We demonstrate this concept by examining the effect of SHM system configuration and flaw characteristics on the response of a signal from a known piezoelectric wafer active sensor (PWAS) in an aluminum plate, using simulation models of a particular hot spot. We derive the signal responses mathematically and through the statistical design of experiments, we determine the significant factors that affect the damage indices that are computed from the signal, using only half the number of runs that are normally required. We determine that the transmitter angle is the largest source of variation for the damage indices that are considered, followed by signal frequency and transmitter distance to the hot spot. These results demonstrate that the use of efficient statistical design and simulation may enable a cost- and time-efficient sequential approach to quantifying sensitive SHM factors and system validation.

Highlights

  • Structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are automated methods for determining the change in the integrity of a mechanical system [1]

  • Recall that this plot visually demonstrates the probability that is associated with the observed effect on the response for each of the factors and interactions under the modeling assumptions that are associated with the analysis of variance (ANOVA)

  • The factors that had the largest effects varied by the damage index that was chosen for the detection of damage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are automated methods for determining the change in the integrity of a mechanical system [1]. SHM systems would ideally comprise of embedded sensors working autonomously to provide an in situ, real-time assessment of the structural health. Structural Integrity Program (ASIP) [2]. The Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP) utilizes an inspection process that includes the potential for the use of SHM systems to detect damage, which better aligns with the 2008 Department of Defense (DoD) implemented Condition-Based Maintenance. The SHM system, though, must be validated as required by ASIP. It is the center of discussion in many communities, since the Aerospace 2018, 5, 45; doi:10.3390/aerospace5020045 www.mdpi.com/journal/aerospace

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call