Abstract

Energy models are used to illustrate, calculate and evaluate energy futures under given assumptions. The results of energy models are energy scenarios representing uncertain energy futures. The discussed approach for uncertainty quantification and evaluation is based on Bayesian Model Averaging for input variables to quantitative energy models. If the premise is accepted that the energy model results cannot be less uncertain than the input to energy models, the proposed approach provides a lower bound of associated uncertainty. The evaluation of model-based energy scenario uncertainty in terms of input variable uncertainty departing from a probabilistic assessment is discussed. The result is an explicit uncertainty quantification for input variables of energy models based on well-established measure and probability theory. The quantification of uncertainty helps assessing the predictive potential of energy scenarios used and allows an evaluation of possible consequences as promoted by energy scenarios in a highly uncertain economic, environmental, political and social target system. If societal decisions are vested in computed model results, it is meaningful to accompany these with an uncertainty assessment. Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) for input variables of energy models could add to the currently limited tools for uncertainty assessment of model-based energy scenarios.

Highlights

  • Energy models are used to illustrate, calculate and evaluate energy futures under given assumptions

  • Probability assessment Departing from the above stated premise that an energy model output cannot be less uncertain than its input and the fact that epistemic uncertainty must be respected by a method, an uncertainty assessment in probabilistic terms of input variables will be presented

  • The results suggest that the natural gas price as an input variable holds an uncertainty of at least 89 %, given the data used

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Energy models are used to illustrate, calculate and evaluate energy futures under given assumptions. The method discussed renders the uncertainty evaluation more tangible to modellers and receivers of energy model scenarios. It can be perceived as an application of the discussion provided by Culka in [1]. The presented definition of uncertainty derived from basic probability theory is novel, and the application was not formulated as such for energy economic contexts to my knowledge. It is limited to the assessment of input variables, and a specific kind of assumption uncertainty

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call