Abstract

In this paper, we describe a traceable measurement method for the frequency response of commercial real-time digital oscilloscopes (RTDOs). Since the commercial RTDOs usually use multiple analog digital convertors (ADCs), it is very challenging to characterize each ADC without having access to the internal circuitry. In this study, we use an additional continuous wave (CW) source to match the sampling sequence in a time interleaved ADC (TIADC). We also use a calibrated pulse standard traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Since the sampling rate of a single ADC is greatly reduced, we slightly misalign the sampling rate of the pulse and the single ADC and then stack the multiple measured pulses as a single pulse. As a result, the sampling rate can be greatly increased by about 8000 times. The frequency response of the RTDO during testing shows a variation of ±1 dB in amplitude and ±7° in phase between ADCs at the maximum operating frequency. These differences need to be calibrated as they cause systematic errors in the measurement. The 95% confidence interval of the measured frequency response is about 0.2 dB in amplitude and 3° in phase. Finally, the measured amplitude is compared with the swept sine measurement method, which confirms that they agree well within its uncertainties.

Highlights

  • A commercial real-time oscilloscope (RTDO) has been widely used in various applications because the bandwidth and sampling rate have greatly increased

  • The bandwidth of most real-time digital oscilloscopes (RTDOs) was sub-GHz, and this impairment in the time interleaved analog digital convertor (TIADC) could be represented as offset error, gain, and timing skew

  • A method was proposed for evaluating the relative difference of the TIADC using a continuous wave (CW) source [2], [3]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A commercial real-time oscilloscope (RTDO) has been widely used in various applications because the bandwidth and sampling rate have greatly increased. A method was proposed for evaluating the relative difference of the TIADC using a continuous wave (CW) source [2], [3] They showed that the frequency-dependent difference can be modeled as a frequency response and offset errors. They proved that the input signal can be perfectly reconstructed with the prior known frequency response of each ADC when the input signal is band-limited.

CHARACTERIZATION METHOD
PULSE ALIGNMENT
UNCERTAINTY OF IMPEDANCE MISMATCH AND RESPONSE OF PD
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call