Abstract

In the current practice of sandy shoreline change assessments, the local sedimentary budget is evaluated using the sediment balance equation, that is, by summing the contributions of longshore and cross-shore processes. The contribution of future sea-level-rise induced by climate change is usually obtained using the Bruun rule, which assumes that the shoreline retreat is equal to the change of sea-level divided by the slope of the upper shoreface. However, it remains unsure that this approach is appropriate to account for the impacts of future sea-level rise. This is due to the lack of relevant observations to validate the Bruun rule under the expected sea-level rise rates. To address this issue, this article estimates the coastal settings and period of time under which the use of the Bruun rule could be (in)validated, in the case of wave-exposed gently-sloping sandy beaches. Using the sedimentary budgets of Stive (2004) and probabilistic sea-level rise scenarios based on IPCC, we provide shoreline change projections that account for all uncertain hydrosedimentary processes affecting idealized coasts (impacts of sea-level rise, storms and other cross-shore and longshore processes). We evaluate the relative importance of each source of uncertainties in the sediment balance equation using a global sensitivity analysis. For scenario RCP 6.0 and 8.5 and in the absence of coastal defences, the model predicts a perceivable shift toward generalized beach erosion by the middle of the 21st century. In contrast, the model predictions are unlikely to differ from the current situation in case of scenario RCP 2.6. Finally, the contribution of sea-level rise and climate change scenarios to sandy shoreline change projections uncertainties increases with time during the 21st century. Our results have three primary implications for coastal settings similar to those provided described in Stive (2004) : first, the validation of the Bruun rule will not necessarily be possible under scenario RCP 2.6. Second, even if the Bruun rule is assumed valid, the uncertainties around average values are large. Finally, despite these uncertainties, the Bruun rule predicts rapid shoreline retreat of sandy coasts during the second-half of the 21st century without strong reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.

Highlights

  • One of the most important challenge for coastal adaptation is the rise of sea-level caused by anthropogenic climate change (Slangen et al, 2014b; Dangendorf et al, 2015)

  • It should be possible to assess the Bruun rule validity by the mid-21st century by sea-level rise should occur during the second half of the 21st century, if sea-level rise follows the IPCC projections

  • We examined where and by which period of time the Bruun effect should become observable on waveexposed sandy coasts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most important challenge for coastal adaptation is the rise of sea-level caused by anthropogenic climate change (Slangen et al, 2014b; Dangendorf et al, 2015). Equation (1) applies to the upper shoreface of the coastal tract (Cowell et al, 2003a) It assumes that the upper shoreface keeps the same profile and translates seaward or landward depending on the sediment budget. The term ξ/tan(β) represents the impacts of sea-level change and corresponds to the Bruun rule (Bruun, 1962). While this term has been subject of debate over the last decades (Cooper and Pilkey, 2004; Ranasinghe and Stive, 2009; Woodroffe and Murray-Wallace, 2012; Passeri et al, 2015), there is no clear recommendation to leave it out.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.