Abstract
The large variability in Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) data produced by different laboratories, difficult to be simply removed by improvements and more rigid standardization of testing procedures, makes uncertain the application of such data to component life prediction. Instead of analyzing causes of errors in LCF tests, this paper addresses the problem of the consequences. At least in a simple (1-D, isothermal) LCF case, it is shown that the life estimate can be considerably shielded from errors in input data, provided certain conditions are met.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
