Abstract

Time‐resolved magneto‐optics is a well‐established optical pump–probe technique to generate and to probe spin coherence in semiconductors. By this method, spin dephasing times can easily be determined if their values are comparable to the available pump–probe delays. If exceeds the laser repetition time, however, resonant spin amplification (RSA) can equally be used to extract . We demonstrate that in ZnO these techniques have several tripping hazards resulting in deceptive values for and show how to avoid them. We show that the temperature dependence of the amplitude ratio of two separate spin species can easily be misinterpreted as a strongly temperature‐dependent of a single spin ensemble, while the two spin species have values, which are nearly independent of temperature. Additionally, consecutive pump pulses can significantly diminish the spin polarization, which remains from previous pump pulses. While this barely affects values extracted from delay line scans, it results in seemingly shorter values in RSA.

Highlights

  • For almost two decades ultrafast magneto-optical pump-probe methods have become standard techniques for triggering and probing spin coherence in direct band gap semiconductors [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]

  • 5 Conclusions We have studied spin dephasing in aluminum doped ZnO by time-resolved Faraday ellipticity measurements using time-domain and B field dependent resonant spin amplification scans

  • We demonstrated that a standard pump-probe delay scan can be misinterpreted, if the spin dephasing time exceeds the experimentally available pump-probe delay

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For almost two decades ultrafast magneto-optical pump-probe methods have become standard techniques for triggering and probing spin coherence in direct band gap semiconductors [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. Spin precession in a transverse magnetic field is usually monitored by linearly polarized probe pulses, either measuring the polarization rotation in transmission (Faraday effect) [2] or reflection (Kerr effect) [4]. Their respective ellipticities can be analyzed [16]. Kuhlen et al.: Unambiguous determination of spin dephasing times in ZnO linear cryostat

Ti:Sa
Δt chopper closed
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call