Abstract
This work explores an implicit definition of ‘existence’. It has been traditionally contended that ‘being’ and ‘existence’ cannot be defined because there is no proximate genus for ‘being’. But a predicate of existence could—in principle—be defined as a theoretical term by its role in a ‘total theory’ of the world in which all our empirical knowledge, our formal knowledge, and our best metaphysical theory is included. It is contended that there is no reason against the intelligibility of a first-order predicate of existence, and that, even further, this predicate has priority over the existential quantifier, because the truthmakers for first-order attributions of existence—whatever they are—have ontological priority to the truthmakers for second-order attributions made by quantifications—whatever they are. Finally, several objections against the implicit definition are considered.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Principia: an international journal of epistemology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
