Abstract

Jamming/un-jamming, the transition between solid- and fluid-like behavior in granular matter, is an ubiquitous phenomenon in need of a sound understanding. As argued here, in addition to the usual un-jamming by vanishing pressure due to a decrease of density, there is also yield (plastic rearrangements and un-jamming that occur) if, e.g., for given pressure, the shear stress becomes too large. Similar to the van der Waals transition between vapor and water, or the critical current in superconductors, we believe that one mechanism causing yield is by the loss of the energy’s convexity (causing irreversible re-arrangements of the micro-structure, either locally or globally). We focus on this mechanism in the context of granular solid hydrodynamics (GSH), generalized for very soft materials, i.e., large elastic deformations, employing it in an over-simplified (bottom-up) fashion by setting as many parameters as possible to constant. Also, we complemented/completed GSH by using various insights/observations from particle simulations and calibrating some of the theoretical parameters—both continuum and particle points of view are reviewed in the context of the research developments during the last few years. Any other energy-based elastic-plastic theory that is properly calibrated (top-down), by experimental or numerical data, would describe granular solids. But only if it would cover granular gas, fluid, and solid states simultaneously (as GSH does) could it follow the system transitions and evolution through all states into un-jammed, possibly dynamic/collisional states—and back to elastically stable ones. We show how the un-jamming dynamics starts off, unfolds, develops, and ends. We follow the system through various deformation modes: transitions, yielding, un-jamming and jamming, both analytically and numerically and bring together the material point continuum model with particle simulations, quantitatively.Graphic abstract

Highlights

  • The macroscopic Navier-Stokes equations allow one to describe Newtonian fluids with constant transport coefficients

  • Some open questions are: How can we understand phenomena that originate from the particle- or meso-scale, which is intermediate between atoms and the macroscopic, hydrodynamic scale? And how can we formulate a theoretical framework that takes the place of the Navier-Stokes equations?

  • We present a review of granular solid hydrodynamics (GSH) and new constitutive relations based on particle simulations, as well as a minimalist version, in Sect. 3, allowing for analytic solutions in Sect. 4, and numeric calculations to catch some transitions in Sect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The macroscopic Navier-Stokes equations allow one to describe Newtonian fluids with constant transport coefficients (e.g., viscosity). In many non-Newtonian systems, complex fluids [1], colloidal suspensions, review [2,3,4], and especially granular matter [5] in its flowing state [6], the transport coefficients depend on various state-variables such as the density and the granular temperature [7]. The research on granular matter in the last decades—to a good fraction inspired by works of Bob Behringer and co-workers—will be briefly reviewed

A brief history of granular research
Open challenges
About states of granular matter
80 Page 4 of 41
Relation to other systems in physics
About elastic granular matter
Yield: About the limits of elasticity
80 Page 6 of 41
Notation and symbols
The isotropic elastic strain
80 Page 8 of 41
Equilibrium conditions and dissipative terms
Classical view on equilibrium states
The limit of solid elasticity
80 Page 10 of 41
Transient elasticity and plasticity
Granular matter
80 Page 12 of 41
Dynamics at constant shear rate or stress
Dynamics in the concave region
Second law of thermodynamics
80 Page 14 of 41
About classical GSH
80 Page 16 of 41
The classical GSH constitutive model
The evolution equations
Minimal GSH type model for a material point
The linear elastic energy
The granular linear elastic energy
Δ3 C12
Granular Hertzian energy density
Simplest GSH equations and discussion
80 Page 20 of 41
Minimal elastic model with two variables
Eigen‐values and ‐vectors at elastic instability
GSH with Hertzian type elastic instability
GSH with granular elastic energy instability
Special cases
Analytical results for special cases
Athermal isotropic loading
80 Page 26 of 41
Pure shear transients from an isotropic state
Homogeneous cooling below and above jamming
Discussion of the steady state rheology
80 Page 30 of 41
Numerical solutions of GSH
Effect of elastic dissipation and unjamming
80 Page 32 of 41
DEM particle simulations
Non‐dimensionalization of DEM
Calibration of GSH with DEM
80 Page 34 of 41
Conclusion and Outlook
80 Page 36 of 41
Modes of un‐jamming
Outlook and open questions
80 Page 38 of 41
80 Page 40 of 41
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call