Abstract

In this work we approach firstly to the research aboutargumentation in the context of Science classrooms and then weseek to problematize the criteria matter for identification ofargumentative situations in those contexts. Hereinafter and from areview of theoretical studies of the field, we propose twomain criteria markers to identify argumentative situations:contrast of ideas and reciprocal justifications. Following, wediscuss how those criteria markers contain certain particularcharacteristics of the argumentative situations and then we try toillustrate, in excerpts of two discursive classroom episodes, howthose markers show up themselves as operational to identify thepresence of argumentation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.