Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of ultraviolet-C (UVC) with placebo-UVC on pressure ulcer healing in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DesignDouble-blind randomized trial with stratification for ulcer location to buttock or lower extremity. Subjects were followed up for 1 year postintervention. SettingRehabilitation institution. ParticipantsAdult inpatients and outpatients (N=43) with SCI and stage 2 to 4 pressure ulcers (n=58). InterventionsUlcers and periwound skin were irradiated 3 times per week using UVC or placebo-UVC. The endpoint was wound closure or hospital discharge without closure. Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcome was weekly percent area relative to baseline. Secondary outcomes were mean percent area change between consecutive weeks, surface appearance, weeks to closure, and impact on quality of life and wound status postintervention. ResultsGroups were similar at baseline for all demographic characteristics except ulcer duration (P=.02). Groups were similar when healing was compared overall. Subgroup analysis showed that the percent area relative to baseline for stage 2 buttock ulcers was significantly smaller in the group receiving UVC compared with placebo at weeks 3, 5, and 7. During weeks 1 through 8, these ulcers were 26% to 76% of baseline area using UVC versus 111% to 180% for placebo (achieved significant level [ASL], .03–.08; effect size, 0.5–0.8). Groups were similar in the percent area relative to baseline for stage 2 lower extremity ulcers. Group mean percent area change between consecutive weeks for all stage 2 ulcers was 36.6% with the use of UVC and 5.8% for placebo (ASL=.09). There were no group differences in the percent area relative to baseline and the mean percent area change between consecutive weeks for stage 3 to 4 ulcers. Groups were similar for all other secondary outcomes. ConclusionsUVC is beneficial for stage 2 buttock ulcers. Further studies are warranted using a larger sample size, carefully considered exclusion criteria, and strategies to ensure homogeneity of the groups that are being compared.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.