Abstract

To the Editor, Real-time ultrasound guidance has become a standard of care for the placement of central venous catheters, and it is gaining in popularity for other types of vascular access, such as cannulation of arteries and peripheral veins. An ‘‘out-of-plane’’ or ‘‘in-plane’’ technique can be utilized (the path of the needle is directed perpendicular or parallel to the ultrasound beam, respectively); however, with either technique, correct identification of the needle tip during advancement is crucial to avoid complications. The in-plane approach, although technically more challenging, offers the advantage of visualizing the entire length of the needle, thereby possibly reducing posterior vessel wall perforations and punctures of neighbouring organs. We used a LOGIQ Book XP Pro ultrasound machine (GE Medical Systems Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China) and a 10 MHz linear probe and 20G over-the-needle cannula (Becton Dickinson Critical Care Systems Pte Ltd., Singapore) to perform an ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation using an in-plane approach. During the procedure, we observed a short bright line in front of and below the apparent needle tip which was consistently moving along with the needle. Interestingly, now that we look for it, we always see a similar bayonet-like line on the image. This pattern is clearer when the needle tip is intravascular and not obscured by tissues and when the introducer needle (bevel up) is in perfect alignment with the plane of the ultrasound beam (Figure A). Provided a high-frequency probe is used, the line is recognizable with any standard long-bevel intravascular needle or cannula under various ultrasound settings. Artifacts are commonly seen with ultrasound imaging, and although this short line might be regarded as an insignificant artifact, we regard this as a real image that must be interpreted correctly. The short line corresponds to the posterior wall of the needle and could be referred to as the ‘‘bevel line’’. High-resolution ultrasound can distinguish between two points separated by the distance between the anterior and posterior walls of the needle shaft, but the acoustic shadow of the highly reflective anterior needle wall usually obscures the view of the posterior wall. However, when the needle is oriented with the bevel facing upwards, the posterior wall of the needle becomes visible close to the needle tip, past the end of the anterior wall (Figure B). Despite a thorough MEDLINE search, we did not find a publication about the ultrasonic appearance of the needle tip. The concept can be demonstrated easily by inserting the needle into a chicken breast and following its ultrasound image as it is rotated 180 along its long axis. When the bevel faces up, the broken line corresponding to the posterior wall is clearly seen, but the line disappears when the bevel faces the opposite direction (Video, accessible as supplementary electronic material). In our view, these observations have two practical consequences. First, although the in-plane approach allows Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12630-012-9683-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call