Abstract

The encouraging results of percutaneous abscess drainage (PAD) in simple intra-abdominal abscesses have led us to employ this method in patients with more complex abdominal inflammatory disease, such as those with multiple enteric communicating or multilocular abscesses and patients in whom the percutaneous approach requires puncture routes traversing uninvolved organs. Cure was achieved in 74 per cent of all patients (83 of 112 patients) who underwent PAD, but in only 50 per cent of patients with multiple intra-abdominal abscesses (n = 16), 50 per cent of patients with complex pancreatic inflammatory disease (n = 8) and 57 per cent of patients with complex intraparenchymal abscesses (n = 7). PAD contributed to cure in eight of nine patients with enteric communicating abscesses. The transhepatic route to perihepatic abscesses proved to be safe. Complications occurred in nine patients (8 per cent). No relationship was noted between the severity or number of complications and the indication for PAD. Of the 29 failures of PAD, 17 patients were cured by either surgical intervention (14 patients) or a second PAD (1 patient) or a combination of the two methods (2 patients). Twelve patients (11 per cent) died, eight from sepsis due to inadequate drainage. Frequent reassessment by ultrasonography and computerized tomography (CT) in patients with prolonged sepsis after PAD is mandatory. These results justify a place for PAD in the management of the often critically ill patient with complex abdominal inflammatory disease.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call