Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus port site infiltration for postoperative pain and quality of recovery in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial.

Abstract

Pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is common and results in poor quality of recovery. Our study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of port site local infiltration, novel erector spinae plane (ESP) block, and standard regimen in patients undergoing LC and its impact on functional recovery. After ethical approval and registering the trial, we randomly allocated 105 adult patients undergoing LC to three groups: Group I (n = 35), received multimodal analgesia; Group II (n = 35), received pre-incisional port site infiltration with 20 ml of 0.375% bupivacaine; and Group III (n = 35), preoperative bilateral ESP block with 20 ml of 0.375% bupivacaine bilaterally was administered. Pain severity, fentanyl consumption, and time to first rescue analgesia were recorded over 24 h. Quality of recovery (QoR-15) was assessed at baseline and 24 h postoperatively. Pain in the first 6 h was lowest in the ESP group (P < 0.001). Although static pain in the infiltration group was comparable with that in the ESP group after 6 h (P > 0.05), dynamic pain was better in the ESP group till 20 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). Fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the ESP group (P < 0.001). Global and sub-dimensional QoR-15 scores were significantly higher only in the ESP group at 24 h compared to the other two groups (P < 0.001). The infiltration group did better than the control group in terms of total opioid requirement (P < 0.001) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after 6 h (P < 0.001). ESP block provided lower postoperative pain scores with opioid-sparing and better quality of recovery in patients undergoing LC.