Abstract

BackgroundCommonly used ultrasound fetal weight estimation formulas show variable degrees of error which is more evident in fetuses with nutritional and metabolic issues; better accuracy of fetal weight estimation can be obtained by incorporation of fetal soft tissue parameters like the fetal subcutaneous tissue in the weight estimation process. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness (FASTT) as an indicator of fetal birth weight.ResultsFASTT showed a high significant statistical correlation with fetal birth weight (r = 0.94, P value = 0.00); it showed higher sensitivity for large for gestational age (LGA) than small for gestational age (SGA) (90.9% and 86.9%, respectively). The best cutoff value for the detection of LGA was ≥ 9.2 mm and ≤ 4.5 for SGA. FASTT showed lower accuracy than abdominal circumference (AC) as an indicator of LGA (92% versus 96%, respectively). Used alone, FASTT is less sensitive than Hadlock formula in both LGA and SGA (90.9% versus 94.5% in LGA and 86.9% versus 88.9% for SGA, respectively). There was no statistical correlation between FASTT and mode of delivery (r = 0.09, P value = 0.23) nor fetal gender (r = 0.15, P value = 0.11)ConclusionFASTT is a good indicator of fetal birth weight especially LGA, yet it is less sensitive than AC in the prediction of LGA. It cannot be used as a predictor of mode of delivery and not affected by fetal gender.

Highlights

  • Used ultrasound fetal weight estimation formulas show variable degrees of error which is more evident in fetuses with nutritional and metabolic issues; better accuracy of fetal weight estimation can be obtained by incorporation of fetal soft tissue parameters like the fetal subcutaneous tissue in the weight estimation process

  • High statistical significant difference was noted between the fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness (FASTT) and gestational age calculated by date

  • The current study concluded that FASTT showed a high statistically significant correlation with estimated fetal weight (EFW) by Hadlock formula and Birth weight (BW); a high statistically significant difference between each of the birth weight categories regarding the value of EFW by Hadlock formula as well as by FASTT was noted

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Used ultrasound fetal weight estimation formulas show variable degrees of error which is more evident in fetuses with nutritional and metabolic issues; better accuracy of fetal weight estimation can be obtained by incorporation of fetal soft tissue parameters like the fetal subcutaneous tissue in the weight estimation process. Ultrasound is the best used technique for fetal growth monitoring and fetal weight estimation. The use of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) in fetal weight estimation is under study. Not widely used in clinical practice for fetal weight estimation, MRI may be more accurate than two-dimensional ultrasound imaging in fetal weight estimation. ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) values of the placenta and fetal organs were studied to detect IUGR (intrauterine growth restriction) fetuses.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call