Ultrasound in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of enoral and plunging ranula: a detailed and comparative analysis

Abstract

PurposeTo develop sonographic criteria for ranula that to allow rapid and precise diagnosis, differentiation between enoral (ER) and plunging ranula (PR), and differential diagnosis from other competing pathologies in this region.MethodsPatients who presented with or were referred with ranula between 2002 and 2022 were assessed in a retrospective study. After clinical investigation, ultrasound examinations were performed in all cases. Several sonographic parameters describing the echotexture, shape and size of ranulas, their relationship to important surrounding anatomical landmarks and the characteristic spreading pattern of ERs and PRs were elaborated and evaluated.Results207 ranulas were included (82.12% ERs and 17.87% PRs). The ranulas were all in close anatomical relationship to the sublingual gland (SLG) and mylohyoid muscle (MM). The echo texture was hypoechoic to anechoic in 97.6% of the lesions. In comparison with ERs, PRs were larger and irregular in shape significantly more often (P = 0.0001). There were significant differences between ERs and PRs in their exact location relative to the SLG (superficial, deep, anterior, each P = 0.0001; posterior, P = 0.03) and level of the MM (above, below, above and below, P = 0.0001 each). The exact extent and plunging pattern were depicted in all PRs, but naturally in none of the ERs.ConclusionsThe ultrasound criteria developed in this study, confirming previously published results, indicate that ultrasound is an excellent diagnostic tool for diagnosing ranula and differentiating between ERs and PRs.