Abstract

Abstract Introduction Complications related to vascular access frequently arise during transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Vascular access related complications remain the main cause of procedure related adverse events. In the literature, there is no clear evidence supporting the benefit of ultrasound-guided (USG) vascular access. Purpose We hypothesized that USG venipuncture could reduce vascular complication rates and reduce the need for additional interventions due to complications related to vascular access. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective study. The primary endpoint was the rate of major complications, defined as arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and groin hematoma with Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification ≥ 2 requiring interventions such as transfusions or surgical/percutaneous repair and/or resulting in hospital prolongation or readmission). The secondary endpoints were the rate of minor complications, defined as groin hematoma with BARC classification = 1 or bleeding without sequelae, and the composite rate of additional non-scheduled exams and procedures due to vascular complications. The study included all patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation with radiofrequency (RF) between January 2020 and December 2022 in our center, performed by two expert operators: one utilizing a classic palpation (BLIND) approach and the second one employing the USG approach. Identical materials were used for access in both groups, and the choice of protamine administration or closure method was decided by the operator on a case by case basis. In total, there were 946 patients, 352 in USG group and 594 in BLIND group. For patients in both groups who were on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), uninterrupted administration with an international normalized ratio (INR) ratio between 2.0 and 3.0 was required. Results Major complications were significantly reduced in the USG group compared to the BLIND group (0 (0%) in USG vs. 9 (1.5%) in BLIND, P = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in minor complications between the two groups (3 (0.8%) in USG vs. 6 (1.0%) in BLIND, P = 0.809). During hospitalization or readmission, 3 additional non-scheduled exams/procedures were required (3 vascular echos) in the USG group, while 33 were needed in the BLIND group (23 vascular echos, 6 thrombin injections, 2 surgical procedures and 2 CT-Angio) with a significative reduction (P 0.034). Conclusions USG venipuncture was associated with a reduction in major complication rates and a decrease in additional exams required during hospitalization or readmission. However, it did not lead to a reduction in minor complications. These findings support the use of ultrasound in AF ablation procedures to avoid access related complications requiring intervention.Baseline CharacteristicsSummary

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call