Abstract

To evaluate the clinical and endocrine effectiveness of different laser doses for ultrasound-guided transvaginal ovarian interstitial laser treatment in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Between January 2005 and July 2007, 56 women with clomifene citrate-resistant PCOS selected from the patients who were referred to Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital with a request for fertility underwent ultrasound-guided transvaginal ovarian interstitial laser treatment. All subjects were randomly divided into four groups of A, B, C and D. In group A, one coagulation point per ovary was done and group B, two points; group C, three points; group D, four to five points. The size of each point was about 10 mm in diameter (the electrical laser was projected persistently for 1-3 min with a power of 3 -5 W). The serum sexual hormone level, ovulation rate and pregnancy rate within six postoperative months were compared among the four groups. (1) The spontaneous ovulation rates of groups A (0) and B (21%) within six postoperative months were significantly lower than groups C (71% ,P <0. 05) and D (79%, P < 0.01). The accumulative pregnancy rates of group C(43%) and D(36%) for six postoperative months were significantly higher than group A (0; P < 0.01, P < 0.05). Although they were also higher than that of group B, no statistical significance was found (P > 0.05). (2) No statistically significant differences were found among four groups when various preoperative hormone values were compared (P > 0. 05). The mean serum luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone level and LH/ follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) ratio was significantly lower postoperatively in groups C [(6.3 +/- 2.6) U/L, (2.2 +/- 0.7) nmol/L, 1.1 +/- 0.3] and D [(5.8 +/- 2.5) U/L, (2.1 +/- 0.4) nmol/L, 1.0 +/- 0.4] than in groupsA [(11.9 +/- 3.1) U/L, (3.9 +/- 1.6) nmol/L, 2.1 +/- 0.5] and B [(10.4 +/- 3.9) U/L, (3.3 +/- 1.1) nmol/L, 2.0 +/- 0.6], respectively (P < 0.05). The mean LH, testosterone level and LH/FSH ratio reduced more obviously in groups C (42%, 39% and 42%) and D (53%, 40% and 58%) than in groups A (4%, 9% and 16%) and B (11%, 6% and 5%; P < 0.05). All above-mentioned parameters between groups C and D had no statistical significant difference (P > 0.05). One and two intraovarian laser coagulation points per ovary are associated with poor results. Three points per ovary seem to represent the plateau of effective dose for the ovarian interstitial laser treatment. Increasing the dose above it does not improve the outcome.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.