Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation versus Thyroidectomy for the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules in Elderly Patients: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation has been recommended as an alternative to surgery for benign thyroid nodules. However, little is known about the benefit from the application of radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation versus thyroidectomy for elderly patients with benign thyroid nodules. This retrospective study evaluated 230 elderly patients (60 years of age or older) with benign thyroid nodules treated with radiofrequency ablation (R group, n = 49) or thyroidectomy (T group, n = 181). Complications, thyroid function, and treatment variables, including procedural time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization, and cost, were compared after propensity score matching. The volume, volume reduction rate, symptoms, and cosmetic score were also evaluated in the R group. After 1:1 matching, each group had 49 elderly patients. The rate of overall complications and hypothyroidism was 26.5% and 20.4% in the T group, respectively, but these complications were totally absent from the R group (P < .001, P = .001). Patients in the R group had a significantly shorter procedural time (median, 4.8 versus 95.0 minutes, P < .001) and lower cost (US $1979.02 versus US $2208.80, P = .013) than those treated by thyroidectomy. After radiofrequency ablation, the volume reduction rate was 94.1%, and 12.2% of nodules had completely disappeared. The symptom and cosmetic scores were both significantly reduced at the last follow-up. Radiofrequency ablation could be considered as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with benign thyroid nodules.