Ultrasound-guided modified pectoral plane (PECS II) block versus erector spinae plane (ESP) block for perioperative analgesia of surgical treatment of gynecomastia

Abstract

BackgroundNerve block reduces anesthetics requirement, allows faster recovery, and reduces postoperative pain. The modified pectoral plane block (PECS II) and the erector spinae plane block (ESP) have been proposed for nerve block in men undergoing breast surgery for gynecomastia.This study aimed to compare the efficacy of PECS II and ESP for perioperative analgesia in men undergoing surgical treatment of gynecomastia.We conducted a randomized clinical trial on 46 males (with ASA I and II, age range from 18 to 25 years) undergoing surgical gynecomastia treatment in a tertiary medical center. Patients were randomly allocated to receive nerve blocks with either PECS II or ESP in addition to the general anesthesia. The postoperative opioid requirement, analgesic doses, pain intensity on the VAS score, hemodynamic parameters throughout the operation, and complications were recorded and compared for both groups.ResultsPECS II group had more favorable outcomes compared to the ESP group, evident by the significantly less total morphine consumption in 24 h (6.09 vs. 14.26 mg, P ≤ 0.001) and the significantly higher effective analgesic time (6.57 vs. 4.91 h, P ≤ 0.001). In addition, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications recorded in both groups.ConclusionsFor men undergoing elective surgical treatment of gynecomastia, the ultrasound-guided modified PECS II is superior to the ESP in terms of opioid requirement, analgesic doses, and pain intensity.