Abstract
To compare real-time ultrasonography-guided technique versus the traditional land-mark technique for internal Jugular venous cannulation. Randomized controlled trial. Department of Anaesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from September 2013 to July 2014. A total of 200 patients who required internal jugular vein cannulation were randomly assigned using either real-time ultrasound-guided technique or land-mark technique. Access time, number of attempts until successful cannulation, complications and the demographics of each patient were recorded. Access time was significantly less in real-time ultrasound group (34.95 ± 11.47 vs. 146.59 ± 40.20 seconds, p < 0.001). Cannulation was performed in first attempt in 99% of patients in ultrasound group as compared to 89% of landmark group. Complication rate was significantly higher in the land-mark group than in the ultrasound-guided group. Carotid artery puncture rate (9% vs. 1%) and haematoma formation (7% vs. 0%) were more frequent in the land-mark group than in the ultrasound-guided group. Brachial plexus irritation was also more in land-mark group (6% vs. 0%). Access time, failure rate and procedure related complications are reduced when real-time ultrasonography is used to cannulate internal Jugular vein.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
