Abstract
ObjectiveEvaluate the role of midwife with no experience in assisting ultrasound guided embryo transfer. MethodsA prospective randomized study comparing results of IVF after ultrasound guided embryo transfer (ET) assisted either by a midwife with no formal training in US, or by a doctor trained to guide. ET procedure was performed on 553 patients undergoing ultrasound guided ET. The number of embryos transferred, the pregnancy rate (PR), the incidence of extrauterine pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy rate, the implantation rate (IR), difficulty of embryo transfer and quality of US assistance were compared among the groups. ResultsNo significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the number of embryos transferred (2.5+0.7 Group A vs 2.4+0.8 Group B) implantation rate (15.6% Group A vs 15.2% Group B), pregnancy rate (34.3% Group A vs 36.2% Group B), ongoing pregnancy rate (23.4% Group A vs 23.9% Group B), and rate of extrauterine pregnancies (1.4% Group A vs 1% Group B). Difficult transfers (2.9% Group A vs 3.6% Group B) and unsatisfactory visualization of uterus and catheter (6.2% Group A vs 7.3% Group B) were also similar in both groups of patients. DiscussionHaving an inexperienced nurse or midwife to perform ultrasound guidance during ET does not markedly affect the clinical results compared to using experienced clinicians for this purpose.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
