Abstract
Diagnostic evaluation of the musculoskeletal system has traditionally been based on medical history, physical examination, and x-rays (techniques that provide limited information), and more re- cently on computerized axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (both very expensive). Ultrasound, a non-invasive and less expensive method, has become an indispensable tool for diagnos- ing overuse sports injuries. The Imaging Department at the Cuban Sports Medicine Institute (abbreviated in Spanish as IMD) developed a preventive ultrasound diagnostic imaging method and has applied it for the last 15 years as part of the IMD's medical management of high-performance athletes. Objectives Identify normal ultrasound patterns for knee structures and extensor mechanism alignment, and perform ultrasound imag- ing of the knee on asymptomatic, high-performance athletes to detect alterations and endogenous predisposing factors to overuse sports injuries as a basis for adopting preventive action. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted of 300 non-athletes (control) and 100 Cuban Olympic athletes (preselected for the 2000 Olympic Games in Sydney, Australia). The IMD's Preven- tive Ultrasound Diagnostic Imaging Method was used to perform static and dynamic ultrasound examinations of both knees of all subjects (800 knees total) to determine normal patterns, detect structural alter- ations in the knee, and determine extensor mechanism malalignment. For the latter, Anillo's Patellofemoral Congruence Ultrasound Method was applied to determine the degree of patellar lateralization (RAB angle). Data was processed using descriptive statistics. To compare the ratio of ultrasound knee alterations detected, the Chi-square test was used. Percentiles were calculated based on data from the 600 non-athlete knees and were processed using the SPSS statistics ap- plication. Results Of the 100 athletes studied, 57 were found to have subclinical alterations in one or both knees, distributed as follows: synovitis (30), extensor mechanism malalignment (26), infrapatellar fat pad distortion (15), meniscal echostructure modification (14), ligament echostructure alteration (11), and articular cartilage alteration (7). Analysis of the control group findings established that RAB angle values greater than 13° for both sexes suggest excessive patellar lateralization with respect to the axial axis of the femur, potentially an endogenous risk factor favoring injury. Conclusions Preventive ultrasound diagnostic imaging of the knee, performed using IMD's ultrasound scanning methodology and incorpo- rating the normal ultrasound patterns described in this study, enables diagnosis of distortions in the articular and periarticular echostructure prior to the onset of clinical symptoms, as well as observation of en- dogenous predisposing factors linked to overuse sports injuries. As a result, appropriate measures can be adopted to prevent such injuries and to tailor medical management of high-performance athletes.
Highlights
Diagnostic evaluation of the musculoskeletal system has traditionally been based on medical history, physical examination, and x-rays, and more recently on computerized axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
Preventive ultrasound diagnostic imaging of the knee, performed using IMD’s ultrasound scanning methodology and incorporating the normal ultrasound patterns described in this study, enables diagnosis of distortions in the articular and periarticular echostructure prior to the onset of clinical symptoms, as well as observation of endogenous predisposing factors linked to overuse sports injuries
The other 43 athletes showed no ultrasound alterations in their knees, nor any predisposing factor related to overuse sports injuries
Summary
Diagnostic evaluation of the musculoskeletal system has traditionally been based on medical history, physical examination, and x-rays (techniques that provide limited information), and more recently on computerized axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (both very expensive). Diagnostic evaluation of the musculoskeletal system has traditionally been based on medical history, physical examination and x-rays (techniques that provide limited information), and more recently on computerized axial tomography (CAT) and magnetic resonance imaging (both very expensive). Ultrasound, a noninvasive and less expensive procedure, has become an indispensable tool for diagnosing overuse sports injuries with relative precision It can be used for individual prophylactic monitoring to detect endogenous factors that appear to be triggers for, or strongly linked to, the appearance of musculoskeletal system conditions.[2,3]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.