Abstract

BackgroundDiagnostic ultrasound is generally considered as a safe test in pregnancy. To date there is no evidence that ultrasound has caused harm to the developing foetus. However, with the number of obstetric scans on the rise and the steep increase in acoustic output achieved by modern machines, the lack of evidence of absolute safety remains a concern. Acoustic output is under the direct control of the operator and is therefore the operator’s responsibility to keep the intensity as low as reasonably achievable. A situation analysis in the South African context was deemed necessary to determine end user knowledge and opinions on safe antenatal ultrasound practice.AimThe aim of this quantitative descriptive, cross-sectional study was to evaluate the knowledge and practice of health practitioners who perform antenatal scans regarding safety aspects of diagnostic ultrasound.SettingA self-administered questionnaire was distributed at two national congresses, hosted by the South African Society of Ultrasound and Obstetrics (SASUOG) and South African Society of Obstetricians (SASOG) committees.MethodQuota non-probability sampling allowed for the identification of professional categories capable of providing information relevant to the study objectives. The sample represented a population with experience in obstetric ultrasound.ResultsCompared to international studies, South African end users demonstrated better knowledge of safety indices than their international counterparts. It is, however, discouraging that end users still demonstrate insufficient knowledge regarding factors contributing to adverse biological effects.ConclusionWith room for improvement, an effort should be made to comply with international standards through increased training efforts and raising awareness.

Highlights

  • The clinical benefits of obstetric ultrasound are well known and it is sometimes viewed as an extension of the human hand in pregnancy management (Joy, Cook & Love 2006:223)

  • No independent longitudinal study on human subjects has confirmed long-term adverse effects, ultrasound bio-effects have been observed in animal studies when similar acoustic outputs were employed (Akhtar et al 2011:981; Sheiner et al 2007:319)

  • Statistical analysis was performed on 121 complete data sets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The clinical benefits of obstetric ultrasound are well known and it is sometimes viewed as an extension of the human hand in pregnancy management (Joy, Cook & Love 2006:223). Diagnostic ultrasound has gained reputation as a safe test; in spite of its apparent safety, ultrasound energy has the potential to cause harm (Sheiner, Freeman & Abramowicz 2007:319) and should, be used by adequately trained personnel only when medically indicated (BMUS 2009; EFSUMB 2006). The assumption that ultrasound exposure is safe for a foetus is not based on safety data, but rather on the lack of evidence of harm (Bagley, Thomas & DiGiancinto 2011:252). To date there is no evidence that ultrasound has caused harm to the developing foetus. With the number of obstetric scans on the rise and the steep increase in acoustic output achieved by modern machines, the lack of evidence of absolute safety remains a concern. A situation analysis in the South African context was deemed necessary to determine end user knowledge and opinions on safe antenatal ultrasound practice

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.