Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the applicability of the ultrasound roughness index (URI) for quantitative assessment of cartilage quality ex vivo (post-mortem), after 6 months of in vivo articulation with a Focal Knee Resurfacing Implant (FKRI).DesignGoats received a metal FKRI (n = 8) or sham surgery (n = 8) in the medial femoral condyles. After 6 months animals were sacrificed, tibial plateaus were stained with Indian ink, and macroscopic scoring of the plateaus was performed based on the ink staining. The URI was calculated from high-frequency ultrasound images at several sections, covering both areas that articulated with the implant and non-articulating areas. Cartilage quality at the most damaged medial location was evaluated with a Modified Mankin Score (MMS).ResultsThe URI was significantly higher in the FKRI-articulating than in the sham plateaus at medial articulating sections, but not at sections that were not in direct contact with the implant, for example, under the meniscus. The mean macroscopic score and MMS were significantly higher in the FKRI-articulating group than in the sham group (, , respectively). Correlation coefficients between URI and macroscopic score were significant in medial areas that articulated with the implant. A significant correlation between URI and MMS was found at the most damaged medial location ().ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of URI to evaluate cartilage roughness and altered surface morphology after in vivo articulation with a metal FKRI, rendering it a promising future tool for quantitative follow-up assessment of cartilage quality.

Highlights

  • Focal cartilage defects (FCDs) can progress into further cartilage damage[1] or osteoarthritis (OA).[2,3] FCDs typically occur in young active people as a consequence of sportrelated injuries, and in middle-aged people aged between 40 and 60 years.[2]

  • This study aims to evaluate the applicability of the ultrasound roughness index (URI) for quantitative assessment of cartilage quality ex vivo, after 6 months of in vivo articulation with a Focal Knee Resurfacing Implant (FKRI)

  • This study demonstrates the potential of URI to evaluate cartilage roughness and altered surface morphology after in vivo articulation with a metal FKRI, rendering it a promising future tool for quantitative follow-up assessment of cartilage quality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Focal cartilage defects (FCDs) can progress into further cartilage damage[1] or osteoarthritis (OA).[2,3] FCDs typically occur in young active people as a consequence of sportrelated injuries, and in middle-aged people aged between 40 and 60 years.[2]. A custom-made implanting device is recommended.[11,16]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call