Abstract
Aim: It is very important to determine the correct nodules which should be evaluated with thyroid fineneedle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and avoid unnecessary operations. In this study, we aimed to analyze the relationship and the compatibility between thyroid FNAB results with ultrasonographic features and the role of the pathologist who examines the specimens. Material and Methods: 458 patients with nodules who underwent FNAB were included in the study. The relationships between the ultrasonographic features (echogenicity, shape, margin, vascularization and calcification) and biopsy results and, the factor of the pathologist were evaluated retrospectively. Since there was no Bethesda VI (malignant) result, analyzes were made among 5 subgroups. FNAB procedures were considered as, inadequate or nondiagnostic, benign, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), follicular neoplasia and suspicion of malignancy. Results: Solid internal structure, irregular margin, hypoechogenicity, presence of microcalcification, nodules with taller than wide (AP> T) were found significantly different between the subgroups of Bethesda classification system (p
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
