Abstract

Recently Hunter [Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 71, 857 (1958)] has called attention to ultrasonically produced alternating potential differences in conductivity water. Rutgers and Rigole [Trans. Faraday Soc. 54, 139 (1958)] also have reported ultrasonic vibration potentials in distilled water and several pure organic liquids including n-heptane. A satisfactory explanation was not advanced by these authors but they suggest that such effects in pure liquids seriously complicate the interpretation of previous work in ionic solutions [e.g., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25, 456 (1953)]. Further research at Western Reserve University with pulse-modulated ultrasonic waves indicates that these apparent effects in non-ionic liquids are associated with the glass or plastic mountings for the metal electrodes and that a condenser-microphone mechanism probably is involved. Since the internal impedance associated with such a source of alternating potentials is high, it does not appear to cause any appreciable difficulties in the measurements in ionic solutions where the internal impedance is much lower. (This research has been supported by the Office of Naval Research.)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.