Abstract
BackgroundUltrasonic scalpel (UC) and monopolar electrocautery (ME) are common tools for soft tissue dissection. However, morphological data on the related tissue alteration are discordant. We developed an automatic device for standardized sample excision and compared quality and depth of morphological changes caused by UC and ME in a pig model.Methods100 tissue samples (5 × 3 cm) of the abdominal wall were excised in 16 pigs. Excisions were randomly performed manually or by using the self-constructed automatic device at standard power levels (60 W cutting in ME, level 5 in UC) for abdominal surgery. Quality of tissue alteration and depth of coagulation necrosis were examined histopathologically. Device (UC vs. ME) and mode (manually vs. automatic) effects were studied by two-way analysis of variance at a significance level of 5%.ResultsAt the investigated power level settings UC and ME induced qualitatively similar coagulation necroses. Mean depth of necrosis was 450.4 ± 457.8 μm for manual UC and 553.5 ± 326.9 μm for automatic UC versus 149.0 ± 74.3 μm for manual ME and 257.6 ± 119.4 μm for automatic ME. Coagulation necrosis was significantly deeper (p < 0.01) when UC was used compared to ME. The mode of excision (manual versus automatic) did not influence the depth of necrosis (p = 0.85). There was no significant interaction between dissection tool and mode of excision (p = 0.93).ConclusionsThermal injury caused by UC and ME results in qualitatively similar coagulation necrosis. The depth of necrosis is significantly greater in UC compared to ME at investigated standard power levels.
Highlights
Ultrasonic scalpel (UC) and monopolar electrocautery (ME) are common tools for soft tissue dissection
Given that tissue alteration processes are different between UC and ME we hypothesized that these dissection tools differ in quality and extent of tissue alteration
This study shows that both, UC and ME lead to a similar histopathologic pattern of coagulation necrosis at the resection plane
Summary
Ultrasonic scalpel (UC) and monopolar electrocautery (ME) are common tools for soft tissue dissection. We developed an automatic device for standardized sample excision and compared quality and depth of morphological changes caused by UC and ME in a pig model. Soft tissue dissection is a major issue in all fields of surgery as it incorporates the risk of wound healing disorder, hematoma or seroma. These adverse events potentially cause additional interventions up to reoperation resulting in patients discomfort and prolonged hospital stay and in persisting morbidity and higher health care costs [1]. We stepped back into an experimental pig model aiming to histopathologically evaluate the quality and extent of morphologic changes caused by UC and ME for soft tissue dissection using 2 types of dissection (manual and automated)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
