Abstract

BackgroundEarly diagnosis of Osteoarthritis (OA) is essential for preventing further cartilage destruction and decreasing severe complications. The aims of this study are to explore the relationship between OA pathological grades and quantitative acoustic parameters and to provide more objective criteria for ultrasonic microscopic evaluation of the OA cartilage.MethodsArticular cartilage samples were prepared from rabbit knees and scanned using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Three quantitative parameters, including the roughness index of the cartilage surface (URI), the reflection coefficients from the cartilage surface (R) and from the cartilage-bone interface (Rbone) were extracted. The osteoarthritis grades of these cartilage samples were qualitatively assessed by histology according to the grading standards of International Osteoarthritis Institute (OARSI). The relationship between these quantitative parameters and the osteoarthritis grades was explored.ResultsThe results showed that URI increased with the OA grade. URI of the normal cartilage samples was significantly lower than the one of the OA cartilage samples. There was no significant difference in URI between the grade 1 cartilage samples and the grade 2 cartilage samples. The reflection coefficient of the cartilage surface reduced significantly with the development of OA (p < 0.05), while the reflection coefficient of the cartilage-bone interface increased with the increase of grade.ConclusionHigh frequency ultrasound measurements can reflect the changes in the surface roughness index and the ultrasound reflection coefficients of the cartilage samples with different OA grades. This study may provide useful information for the quantitative ultrasonic diagnosis of early OA.

Highlights

  • Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis (OA) is essential for preventing further cartilage destruction and decreasing severe complications

  • This study evaluated 72 articular cartilage samples according to the Osteoarthritis Institute (OARSI) grading system

  • OARSI = Osteoarthritis Research Society International; N is the number of the articular cartilage samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis (OA) is essential for preventing further cartilage destruction and decreasing severe complications. Diagnosis of OA is essential for the timely treatment and prevention against advanced complications [3]. Techniques such as arthroscopy, X-ray computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been used in studies on articular cartilage and OA assessment [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The degenerative changes in the deeper layers of the cartilage tissue are revealed by using this method with difficulty. Clinical MRI imaging remains expensive and its relative long time of imaging and low resolution is limited to cartilage fine structure

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call