Abstract

It is widely agreed that in object categorization bottom-up and top-down influences interact. How top-down processes affect categorization has been primarily investigated in isolation, with only one higher level process at a time being manipulated. Here, we investigate the combination of different top-down influences (by varying the level of category, the animacy and the background of the object) and their effect on rapid object categorization. Subjects participated in a two-alternative forced choice rapid categorization task, while we measured accuracy and reaction times. Subjects had to categorize objects on the superordinate, basic or subordinate level. Objects belonged to the category animal or vehicle and each object was presented on a gray, congruent (upright) or incongruent (inverted) background. The results show that each top-down manipulation impacts object categorization and that they interact strongly. The best categorization was achieved on the superordinate level, providing no advantage for basic level in rapid categorization. Categorization between vehicles was faster than between animals on the basic level and vice versa on the subordinate level. Objects in homogenous gray background (context) yielded better overall performance than objects embedded in complex scenes, an effect most prominent on the subordinate level. An inverted background had no negative effect on object categorization compared to upright scenes. These results show how different top-down manipulations, such as category level, category type and background information, are related. We discuss the implications of top-down interactions on the interpretation of categorization results.

Highlights

  • In object categorization objects are classified corresponding to common characteristics, a process which depends both on perceptual and higher cognitive processing stages

  • This study investigated the influence of different a) levels of abstraction, b) animacy and c) background on ultra rapid object categorization

  • At the subordinate level higher accuracy was observed for the animal category (t(15) = 4.4, p,0.001) and at the superordinate level, no significant difference was obtained for animal and vehicle categories (t(15) = 2.9, p$.05). These results indicate that the categories used in this study reveal different performance patterns at different category levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In object categorization objects are classified corresponding to common characteristics, a process which depends both on perceptual and higher cognitive processing stages. In rapid categorization subjects are better and faster detecting objects in a semantically congruent context [32,40] Another factor may be the physical relationship between an object and its background. Objectbackground proportions such as size, position and orientation may influence object categorization [41,42,43] It remains an open question whether or not such perceptually (physically) incongruent background information affect rapid object categorization processes and whether such physical manipulations differ from semantically manipulations. In this study the background information was varied in terms of orientation (upright vs inverted context), while keeping the level and category constant This allows for the investigation of background manipulations while controlling for object types and task demands. We observed better performance for categorization of objects presented on a gray background than for objects presented on a complex background

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call