Ultra Petita Decision of the Constitutional Court in Test Constitution (Something Perspective Law Progressive)

Abstract

Study this leave from discourse the ultra petita decision has not yet found a point meeting between various parties. Related to the problem that, it is necessary to see whether it is the Constitutional Court Law prohibits ultra petita, including whether the ultra petita doctrine is generally applicable to all judges in various judicial settings. This legal research uses a normative juridical approach with research specifications analytical description. The type of data used is secondary data, consists of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Technique data collection using library research (library research) and from the data which collected and then analyzed by qualitative-normative. Based on results study which conducted get it conclusion, that doctrine ban ultra petita for judge no apply absolute and general. With use approach normative and interpretation systemic could said that provision in Constitution MK nor Regulation MK no give possibility for judge constitution for make decision ultra petita. In issue decisions containing ultra petita, generally the Constitutional Court is based on there is an inseparable relationship between the article being tested and other articles which is not tested, so that the article or the entire law must be stated no powerful law, inside because reason for avoid lawlessness and upholding substantive justice. MK's breakthrough in making in principle, ultra petita decisions are a form of progressive law enforcement, However, any creativity carried out by law enforcement can be ineffective means progressive when not to realize substantive justice, placing justice, benefits and human happiness as a goal finally.