Abstract

BackgroundModern CT might deliver higher image quality than necessary for fracture imaging, which would mean non-essential effective radiation exposure for patients. We simulated ultra-low dose (ULD)-CT at different dose levels and analyzed their diagnostic performance for scaphoid fracture detection.Methods30 consecutive high quality CT with clinically suspected scaphoid fractures were assessed. ULD-simulations were made at 20%, 10% and 5% of original dose. Three readers at different levels of experience (expert, moderate, inexperienced) expressed their diagnostic confidence (DC; 5-point-Likert-scale) and analyzed the presence and classification of scaphoid fractures within Krimmer’s and Herbert’s classifications. Effective radiation exposure of the original data sets and ULD-CT were calculated.ResultsAt 20% and 10% dose the more experienced readers reached perfect sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%), showing perfect agreement regarding fracture classification (1.00). Diagnostic performance decreased at 5% dose (92.86% sensitivity, 100% specificity; expert reader). The inexperienced reader showed reduced sensitivity and specificity at all dose levels. At 10% dose minimal DC of all readers was 3/5 and mean calculated effective radiation exposure was 1.11 [±0.36] µSv.ConclusionsThe results suggest that ULD-CT at 10% dose compared to high quality CT might offer sufficient image quality to precisely detect and classify scaphoid fractures, if moderate experience of the radiologist is granted.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call