Abstract

Brace-rotated and bird-beak joints are novel tubular joint configurations, which are obtained by the rotation of rectangular and/or square hollow section (RHS and/or SHS) members along their respective longitudinal axes by angles corresponding to their cross-sectional diagonal planes. The load vs deformation behaviour and static joint resistances of these novel tubular T-joints are presented in this study. In total, 30 cold-formed high strength steel (CFHSS) member-rotated tubular T-joints were tested. In this paper, member-rotated joints include brace-rotated (BR), square bird-beak (SBB) and diamond bird-beak (DBB) configurations, where RHS and SHS were used as braces and SHS were used as chords. The steel grade of RHS and SHS members was S960. The joint resistances of test specimens were determined by applying axial compression loads through the braces and supporting the chord ends on rollers. The automatic gas metal arc welding process was used to connect braces and chords. The brace width-to-chord width ratio (β) ranged from 0.33 to 0.83, effective brace width-to-chord width ratio (β′) ranged from 0.25 to 0.88, chord width-to-chord thickness ratio (2γ) ranged from 25.3 to 38.9 and brace thickness-to-chord thickness ratio (τ) ranged from 0.67 to 1.28. Three failure modes were observed in this investigation, which include chord face failure (F), combined failure (F + W), and chord crown failure (C). The joint resistances were compared with the nominal resistances obtained from the literature and EC3 (2005, [1]). It has been demonstrated that the design rules available in the literature are generally not suitable for the design of CFHSS brace-rotated and bird-beak T-joints made of S960 steel. Further, the effect of change of member-rotation angle (ω) on the joint resistances of CFHSS T-joints made of S960 steel was observed by comparing the joint resistances of BR, SBB and DBB T-joints of this investigation with the joint resistances of traditional RHS T-joints (Pandey and Young (2019), [2]) made of identical tubular member dimensions and steel grade.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.