Abstract
This review critically analyses research methodologies of two research articles (RA) which titled Assessing the quality of arguments in students’ persuasive writing: A case study analysing the relationship between surface structure and substance by Stapleton and Wu (2015) and Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles by Hu and Wang (2014). Whereas Stapleton and Wu (2015) used Toulmin model and questionnaires to gather data, Hu and Wang (2014) applied CBA (Corpus-Based Approach). Although methodologies used in both RAs are suitable for the research, the questionnaires used in Stapleton and Wu (2015) will gather better result with slightly different wording. Besides analysing the methodologies, the review also discusses the implications of those RAs to EAP teaching
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Makna: Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, Bahasa, dan Budaya
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
