Ubuntu and climate change governance: Moving beyond conceptual conundrum

Abstract

Discussions on the utility of Ubuntu in resolving modern challenges remain inconclusive, as some have argued that ubuntu is out of sync with modern realities. Similarly, lingering political disagreements on human‐induced climate change have continued to negatively affect climate change governance (CCG). The recent philosophical conversation among Matolino, Kwindingwi, Metz and Chimakonam are reminiscent of the first issue. Likewise, sustainable CCG is being undermined by political languages that pose a threat to already overdue global action towards curbing climate change. President Trump's poignant stand toward the issue and the reluctance of some members of the G20 in taking decisive actions are typical. These incidences have direct implication for Africa whose contribution in the CCG debate has hitherto remained minimal. Juxtaposing these two serious issues, this study critically engages the debate on Ubuntu as a viable ethical theory vis‐à‐vis the climate change governance (CCG) challenges. Invigorated by the philosophical “conversation,” this study argues that Ubuntu provides a robust alternative framework to address global common problems such as climate change. It also concedes that the “conversation” on the status of Ubuntu is a necessity for the project of developing an African contribution to practical global issues.